Thank you for your update, Melissa ... as I did partake of the courts live coverage, on Day1 from about 1-2 pm , and the Behaviour & demeanour of the judge was obvious; and it only got worse.
It was as if you , and you injured patients , and , in particular, your K C were the guilty ones - such was her Ill-mannered tirades and nonsense about procedure - what a shambles.
Well, I’m going to re-read the entire details,,, knowing that you will give this your utmost to bring sanity to that place.
Good luck, your support grows each & every day - ... for the victims, we pray for a fair go. That’s all...
Scandalous must be the go to word within the judiciary. The following is an extract from Julian Gillespie's recent Substack re; Helen Rofe & her boss/ saviour Deb Mortimer. I hate to rain on the parade but these people "scrum down" & find a way to dismiss any claim whilst throwing insults on the way out. Be prepared.
Minimal Acknowledgment of Public and Legislative Outcry
Mortimer’s decision barely acknowledges the significant public and parliamentary response to Rofe’s nondisclosure, dismissing it as “scandalous.” Go figure. Sections 60 and 61 reflect Mortimer’s view that these concerns are unworthy of serious consideration .. namely, your views are unworthy .. further indicating a legalistic approach that distances the judiciary from public accountability. By characterizing these concerns as unsubstantiated, Mortimer downplays the importance of judicial transparency in a case that has drawn widespread public attention, particularly from Federal Senators and the public. This dismissal highlights a disconnect between judicial reasoning and the expectations of transparency and impartiality held by the broader public.
Words can not express our love and gratitude for you.
The people standing up for the injured all have one thing in common, they take the time to see us, hear us, and try to understand what it is like for us to live like this. You feel our pain, see the mistreatment and gaslighting, the dismissal we face.
The TGA, AHPRA, the government and the justice system only see us as numbers, stories on paper, statistics.
We are more than that, and if it takes a year of court, to investigate the full extent, then we do deserve this time spent. It’s still, so far only one third of the 3 years we have been left with waiting, suffering and grieving our old lives.
Gods time and justice will come.. no matter what happens in any court.. this I know 🙏
Thank you for this excellent update, Dr McCann, I am now updating my Substack to link to it. Thank you so much for your hard work, and for trying to hard to help the injured.
For the government to give the mRNA manufacturers an indemnity from liability, means that they acknowledge that a duty of care exists. They cannot now argue that it dors not.
The Australian Government does not owe a duty of care to its citizens. Really? KC for class action should be ripping this defence to shreds. It is inconceivable that it is even being argued by the defence, let alone being heard and potentially accepted by Justice Katzmann.
I watched the interlocutory hearing on Monday and it was abundantly clear to me that Justice Katzmann is biased in favour of the government defence. Her verbal and non-verbal communication demonstrated that she is unable to act impartially, and is potentially even coaching the defence team on how best to have the matter struck out without going to trial. And even if it does go to trial, her bias (whether conscious or unconscious) means that it is totally inappropriate for her honour to preside over the trial. Justice Katzmann’s integrity and capacity to act impartially in this matter is obviously compromised for some reason. One does not need to ponder too long to understand some reasons why this might be the case. The matter may also just be too big for her to comprehend that her beloved employer has acted unlawfully. And the public scrutiny too large for her to manage, should it proceed to trial. Better to “nip it in the bud” before it gets any more complex.
This is totally unacceptable.
I accept that this matter and class action is one of the most controversial in colonial Australia’s short history. That makes it all the more critical that the matter goes to trial, and that the trial is presided over by a suitably impartial and unbiased judge.
Accordingly, lawyers / KC for the class action should be seeking an alternative federal judge to preside over this case. Immediately.
I watched the live on Day 1 and I found the judge to be hostile towards the plaintiff. My heart breaks for the vaccine injured. I 🙏 this judge has the fortitude to see right from wrong and can see how futile it is continuing to cover for the evil and corrupt who pull the strings. Discovery is long overdue, the question is which Justice is going to break away and stand with the people.
Wishing Dr McCann and the vaccine injured a positive outcome, accountability from those that pushed safe and effective, the resources to heal and closure😊
The lawyers are getting rich, the judges are getting pats on the back from the perpetrators, and the victim’s are left pissing into the wind.
As with the healthcare system, we must come to terms that ALL of our trusted institutions are facades placed in front of the rich and powerful to protect them, not you.
Carefully crafted words do not need prove anything in a court of law nowadays because it’s not proof they require to bring justice, just a few chosen lies to stop the righteous from winning back control.
More than a year for her honour to understand the claim? What a ridiculous proposition for a judge to suggest.
Even if it did take a year (which it obviously would not - even for a layperson) then so be it. What has time got to do with whether the matter should proceed to trial or not. Time is absolutely irrelevant in this (or any trial for that matter). Lawyers / KC for class action should also be ripping this defence argument apart. All that matters is whether people have been injured or died as a result of the vaccines being mandated, and whether laws have been broken in the process of mandating the vaccines. And for this to be determined, the matter needs to go to trial.
Another reason why Justice Katzmann should not be presiding over this trial. She is apparently incompetent, and is clearly not impartial. Her honour should be the first to criticise and educate any legal counsel should they attempt to bring a factor like a lengthy trial time concern as a reason for a trial to not proceed. Let alone introduce such a factor herself. Patently ridiculous.
Just a snippet but in the context of the article it makes sense even more so
This story is important, not because Trump's transition team withdrewa bad candidate and smartly yielded to quiet conservative pressure. Rather, this story is a morality tale about accountability and justice over people's decisions during covid, with a side dish about how transformative social media has become, since Chronister's offensive covid record would have been concealed by corporate media just a few years ago.
There's zero appetite to let things go, forgive and forget, or Move On. The absence of any official accountability for pandemic excesses has created an abhorrent vacuum of intense frustration that nature has filled with a vast, informal army of volunteer enforcers, both individuals and conservative groups. It's a kind of unorganized covid reconciliation movement.
For example, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association opposed Chronister's nomination, saying it was "shocked and dismayed" by his selection because of his enforcement of covid mandates. Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and others tweeted their Concerns about Chronister, calling him competely disqualified.
How long can the judiciary keep saying 'scandalous' to cover their own scandalous subservience to big pharma and it's henchmen, the govt? Every time they destroy judicial credibility a little bit more, or a lot more, they lose control, they are not gaining it!! Since control is the focus of totalitarianism, they are shooting themselves in the foot/feet. Indigenous people know that govt does not help the people, now the rest of us know too.
Thank you for your update, Melissa ... as I did partake of the courts live coverage, on Day1 from about 1-2 pm , and the Behaviour & demeanour of the judge was obvious; and it only got worse.
It was as if you , and you injured patients , and , in particular, your K C were the guilty ones - such was her Ill-mannered tirades and nonsense about procedure - what a shambles.
Well, I’m going to re-read the entire details,,, knowing that you will give this your utmost to bring sanity to that place.
Good luck, your support grows each & every day - ... for the victims, we pray for a fair go. That’s all...
Les Kraft ..is
Les Catterwell
Our continued support is guaranteed- ....Les
Scandalous must be the go to word within the judiciary. The following is an extract from Julian Gillespie's recent Substack re; Helen Rofe & her boss/ saviour Deb Mortimer. I hate to rain on the parade but these people "scrum down" & find a way to dismiss any claim whilst throwing insults on the way out. Be prepared.
Minimal Acknowledgment of Public and Legislative Outcry
Mortimer’s decision barely acknowledges the significant public and parliamentary response to Rofe’s nondisclosure, dismissing it as “scandalous.” Go figure. Sections 60 and 61 reflect Mortimer’s view that these concerns are unworthy of serious consideration .. namely, your views are unworthy .. further indicating a legalistic approach that distances the judiciary from public accountability. By characterizing these concerns as unsubstantiated, Mortimer downplays the importance of judicial transparency in a case that has drawn widespread public attention, particularly from Federal Senators and the public. This dismissal highlights a disconnect between judicial reasoning and the expectations of transparency and impartiality held by the broader public.
..
Thank you. I’ve forwarded this update to Dr Tess Lawrie in the UK for her interest, along with Alison Bevege’s latest Substack post.
Words can not express our love and gratitude for you.
The people standing up for the injured all have one thing in common, they take the time to see us, hear us, and try to understand what it is like for us to live like this. You feel our pain, see the mistreatment and gaslighting, the dismissal we face.
The TGA, AHPRA, the government and the justice system only see us as numbers, stories on paper, statistics.
We are more than that, and if it takes a year of court, to investigate the full extent, then we do deserve this time spent. It’s still, so far only one third of the 3 years we have been left with waiting, suffering and grieving our old lives.
Gods time and justice will come.. no matter what happens in any court.. this I know 🙏
Thank you for this excellent update, Dr McCann, I am now updating my Substack to link to it. Thank you so much for your hard work, and for trying to hard to help the injured.
Yes control f
I thought these people were educated
The parts that I saw showed more of a pantomime, a display if you will, of fair process underway...
The good thing about this further delay is between now and February even more stuff will come to the surface
Let's continue forward and God bless you Mel for everything you do
For the government to give the mRNA manufacturers an indemnity from liability, means that they acknowledge that a duty of care exists. They cannot now argue that it dors not.
Thank you for the update Dr Mel,
The Australian Government does not owe a duty of care to its citizens. Really? KC for class action should be ripping this defence to shreds. It is inconceivable that it is even being argued by the defence, let alone being heard and potentially accepted by Justice Katzmann.
I watched the interlocutory hearing on Monday and it was abundantly clear to me that Justice Katzmann is biased in favour of the government defence. Her verbal and non-verbal communication demonstrated that she is unable to act impartially, and is potentially even coaching the defence team on how best to have the matter struck out without going to trial. And even if it does go to trial, her bias (whether conscious or unconscious) means that it is totally inappropriate for her honour to preside over the trial. Justice Katzmann’s integrity and capacity to act impartially in this matter is obviously compromised for some reason. One does not need to ponder too long to understand some reasons why this might be the case. The matter may also just be too big for her to comprehend that her beloved employer has acted unlawfully. And the public scrutiny too large for her to manage, should it proceed to trial. Better to “nip it in the bud” before it gets any more complex.
This is totally unacceptable.
I accept that this matter and class action is one of the most controversial in colonial Australia’s short history. That makes it all the more critical that the matter goes to trial, and that the trial is presided over by a suitably impartial and unbiased judge.
Accordingly, lawyers / KC for the class action should be seeking an alternative federal judge to preside over this case. Immediately.
I watched the live on Day 1 and I found the judge to be hostile towards the plaintiff. My heart breaks for the vaccine injured. I 🙏 this judge has the fortitude to see right from wrong and can see how futile it is continuing to cover for the evil and corrupt who pull the strings. Discovery is long overdue, the question is which Justice is going to break away and stand with the people.
Wishing Dr McCann and the vaccine injured a positive outcome, accountability from those that pushed safe and effective, the resources to heal and closure😊
The lawyers are getting rich, the judges are getting pats on the back from the perpetrators, and the victim’s are left pissing into the wind.
As with the healthcare system, we must come to terms that ALL of our trusted institutions are facades placed in front of the rich and powerful to protect them, not you.
So now what we gonna do?
Carefully crafted words do not need prove anything in a court of law nowadays because it’s not proof they require to bring justice, just a few chosen lies to stop the righteous from winning back control.
More than a year for her honour to understand the claim? What a ridiculous proposition for a judge to suggest.
Even if it did take a year (which it obviously would not - even for a layperson) then so be it. What has time got to do with whether the matter should proceed to trial or not. Time is absolutely irrelevant in this (or any trial for that matter). Lawyers / KC for class action should also be ripping this defence argument apart. All that matters is whether people have been injured or died as a result of the vaccines being mandated, and whether laws have been broken in the process of mandating the vaccines. And for this to be determined, the matter needs to go to trial.
Another reason why Justice Katzmann should not be presiding over this trial. She is apparently incompetent, and is clearly not impartial. Her honour should be the first to criticise and educate any legal counsel should they attempt to bring a factor like a lengthy trial time concern as a reason for a trial to not proceed. Let alone introduce such a factor herself. Patently ridiculous.
Also please everybody this is only the beginning
The Zeitgeist of this moment in our history is well captured regularly by "coffee and covid"
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/strategic-withdrawal-wednesday-december
Just a snippet but in the context of the article it makes sense even more so
This story is important, not because Trump's transition team withdrewa bad candidate and smartly yielded to quiet conservative pressure. Rather, this story is a morality tale about accountability and justice over people's decisions during covid, with a side dish about how transformative social media has become, since Chronister's offensive covid record would have been concealed by corporate media just a few years ago.
There's zero appetite to let things go, forgive and forget, or Move On. The absence of any official accountability for pandemic excesses has created an abhorrent vacuum of intense frustration that nature has filled with a vast, informal army of volunteer enforcers, both individuals and conservative groups. It's a kind of unorganized covid reconciliation movement.
For example, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association opposed Chronister's nomination, saying it was "shocked and dismayed" by his selection because of his enforcement of covid mandates. Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and others tweeted their Concerns about Chronister, calling him competely disqualified.
" accountability and justice " what is that ?
How long can the judiciary keep saying 'scandalous' to cover their own scandalous subservience to big pharma and it's henchmen, the govt? Every time they destroy judicial credibility a little bit more, or a lot more, they lose control, they are not gaining it!! Since control is the focus of totalitarianism, they are shooting themselves in the foot/feet. Indigenous people know that govt does not help the people, now the rest of us know too.
DISSOLVE THE COMMONWEALTH and start again from scratch. Anything else is just wasting (more) time.
LONG LIVE THE CONFEDERACY!
https://substack.com/@michaelginsburg/note/c-55999264
https://rumble.com/v5w44x2-breaking-news-canadian-and-australian-doctors-severe-warning-about-billc293.html Hi Dr Melissa McCann, I do a podcast in Nova Scotia Canada and would love to have you on my podcast. I have interviewed several doctors and vaccine injured. https://rumble.com/c/sos60